🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision on how best to address the problem is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want additional sea defences to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need productive community discussions to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.